From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Richars

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 18, 2001
792 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

In Richars, the Fourth District dismissed an appeal from the grant of relief under rule 3.620 as concluding that it lacked jurisdiction.

Summary of this case from State v. Green

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-749

Opinion filed July 18, 2001 Rehearing Denied September 17, 2001.

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Royce J. Agner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-9284 CF10A.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Donna L. Eng and Debra Rescigno, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The State appeals the order granting the Defendant's motion to reduce his conviction from robbery to the lesser included offense of resisting a merchant. However, because there is no basis upon which this Court can assert jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

After being found guilty of robbery, the Defendant filed a motion for new trial or, in the alternative, a motion for reduction of his conviction from robbery to the lesser included offenses of petit theft or resisting a merchant. The trial court denied the motion for new trial, but reduced the Defendant's conviction to resisting a merchant pursuant to Rule 3.620, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Section 924.07, Florida Statutes (2000), sets forth what the state can appeal. It does not authorize an appeal from an order granting a motion under rule 3.620.

The State argues that this Court has jurisdiction because the trial court's reduction to a lesser included offense was tantamount to granting a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 9.140(c)(1)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We disagree.

The trial court's ruling on a rule 3.620 motion does not result in an acquittal, only in a conviction of a lesser offense. Because the State's right to appeal is purely statutory, and section 924.07 does not authorize an appeal from this order, we have no jurisdiction. See State v. Allen, 743 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Richars

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 18, 2001
792 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

In Richars, the Fourth District dismissed an appeal from the grant of relief under rule 3.620 as concluding that it lacked jurisdiction.

Summary of this case from State v. Green
Case details for

State v. Richars

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. PATRICK RICHARS, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 18, 2001

Citations

792 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Green

Kidder v. State, 117 So.3d 1166, 1170–71 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (quoting Weston TC LLLP v. CNDP Mktg. Inc., 66…

State v. Exposito

Exposito challenges the State's right to this appeal. Exposito argues that this court has no jurisdiction as…