From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rice

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 21, 1999
160 Or. App. 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 9705-33976; CA A101137

Submitted on briefs and record March 31, 1999

Filed April 21, 1999.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Judge.

Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Defendant appeals her convictions in a trial to the court for possession of a controlled substance and tampering with physical evidence. The state concedes that we must reverse the convictions because the record does not contain a written waiver of defendant's right to a jury trial. Or Const, Art I, § 11; ORS 136.001; State v. Taxon, 142 Or. App. 484, 920 P.2d 567 (1996). We agree.

Defendant also argues that the trial court should have granted her motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of tampering with physical evidence on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to justify a conviction. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient and that the trial court correctly denied the motion.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Rice

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 21, 1999
160 Or. App. 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHRISTINE MICHELLE RICE, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1999

Citations

160 Or. App. 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)
979 P.2d 312