From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reynolds

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 18, 2005
155 S.W.3d 788 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 83984.

January 18, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Donald L. McCullin, Judge.

Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniels, Leslie McNamara (co-counsel), Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, C.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.


ORDER


Andre Reynolds appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for drug trafficking. He claims that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay and by repeatedly instructing the jury to continue deliberating and failing to give a "hammer instruction" or declare a mistrial sua sponte.

We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Reynolds

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 18, 2005
155 S.W.3d 788 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andre REYNOLDS, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jan 18, 2005

Citations

155 S.W.3d 788 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)