From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reinke

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Nov 26, 1980
298 N.W.2d 816 (S.D. 1980)

Opinion

No. 13006.

Submitted on Briefs September 10, 1980.

Decided November 26, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Eighth Judicial Circuit, Lawrence County, Scott C. Moses, J.

Margaret Crew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for plaintiff and appellee; Mark V. Meierhenry, Atty. Gen., Pierre, on brief.

Richard A. Pluimer of Stephens, Quinn, Carr, Tschetter Buckmaster, Belle Fourche, for defendant and appellant.


This is an appeal from an amended order suspending imposition of sentence. We affirm.

Appellant pleaded guilty to third-degree burglary. The trial court accepted a plea bargain agreement and suspended imposition of sentence. In addition to placing appellant on probation for four years, the trial court imposed a $500 fine.

Appellant argues that in the absence of specific statutory authority, an order suspending imposition of sentence cannot require the payment of a fine as a condition of probation. See State v. Marshall, 247 N.W.2d 484 (S.D. 1976), SDCL 23A-27-13. We do not reach this issue.

Appellant concedes that he knowingly accepted the payment of the fine as a condition of probation. He made no objection to the trial court. Consequently, he may not raise his objection to the condition of probation for the first time on appeal. State v. Iverson, 269 N.W.2d 390 (S.D. 1978). See State v. Jackson, 272 N.W.2d 102 (S.D. 1978).

The amended order suspending the imposition of sentence is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Reinke

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Nov 26, 1980
298 N.W.2d 816 (S.D. 1980)
Case details for

State v. Reinke

Case Details

Full title:STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee. v. Robin REINKE, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of South Dakota

Date published: Nov 26, 1980

Citations

298 N.W.2d 816 (S.D. 1980)

Citing Cases

TURO v. SOLEM

This reporting requirement was to report to a parole officer. She cannot be heard to complain about…