From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Regan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 22, 1971
484 P.2d 861 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs April 13, 1971

Affirmed May 6, 1971 Petition for rehearing denied June 8, 1971 Petition for review denied July 22, 1971

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.

EDWIN E. ALLEN, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, and J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for appellant.

Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, and James L. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FOLEY, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


Upon trial by jury, during the course of which her written pretrial confession was introduced into evidence over objection, defendant was convicted of second-degree murder. On appeal she asserts that the confession should not have been admitted because she was so intoxicated at the time she made the statement she could not freely and voluntarily waive her right to counsel and right to remain silent. She does not contend that she was not advised of these rights, but only that because of intoxication she could not understand the advice and act intelligently upon it. Eight witnesses testified that at the time she was advised of her rights she was rational, coherent and fully capable of understanding them.

It is not our function to try a matter such as this de novo. See State v. Fisher, 5 Or. App. 483, 484 P.2d 864, decided this date.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Regan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 22, 1971
484 P.2d 861 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Regan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CAROLYN VEATRY REGAN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 22, 1971

Citations

484 P.2d 861 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
484 P.2d 861

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

In a situation such as this we will not re-try the facts. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or. 485, 443 P.2d 621 (1968);…

State v. Raiford

"What actually transpired is a question of fact for the trial court or jury. If the evidence sustains such…