From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 25, 2009
No. 02-09-293-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. 02-09-293-CV

Delivered: November 25, 2009.

Appealed from the 30th District Court of Wichita County.

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered appellant's "Motion To Dismiss For Mootness." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at * 1 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).


Summaries of

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 25, 2009
No. 02-09-293-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2009)
Case details for

State v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT v. JOSEPH T. REED, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 25, 2009

Citations

No. 02-09-293-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2009)