From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reddog

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Oct 14, 2021
2021 N.D. 180 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

20210055

10-14-2021

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Barry Ryder Reddog, Defendant and Appellant

Julie A. Lawyer, State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief. Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

Julie A. Lawyer, State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1] Barry Reddog appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of robbery with a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit felonious restraint. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle, Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Reddog

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Oct 14, 2021
2021 N.D. 180 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Reddog

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Barry Ryder Reddog…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

2021 N.D. 180 (N.D. 2021)