From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 15, 2022
No. 2021-KP-01893 (La. Feb. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2021-KP-01893

02-15-2022

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. REGINALD REDDICK


State of Louisiana - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court Number(s) 93-03922, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number(s) 2021-K-0589;

Writ application granted. See briefing notice and Order.

JLW

JDH

SJC

JTG

WJC

JBM

PDG

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN L. WEIMER JUSTICES WILLIAM J. CRAIN SCOTT J. CRICHTON JAMES T. GENOVESE JAY B. MCCALLUM JEFFERSON D. HUGHES III PIPER D. GRIFFIN

NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED February 15, 2022

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be mailed out.

Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant or relator, as the case may be, must file their briefs on or before March 14, 2022; and the respondent on or before April 1, 2022.

Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.

It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.

Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.

With kindest regards, I remain, Very truly yours, Ryan Chan Deputy Clerk

On Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Plaquemines, No. 93-03922; Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2021-K-0589.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.


Summaries of

State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 15, 2022
No. 2021-KP-01893 (La. Feb. 15, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Reddick

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. REGINALD REDDICK

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 15, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-KP-01893 (La. Feb. 15, 2022)