From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reask

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76639

Filed: October 3, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, Honorable Emmett M. O'Brien

Douglas R. Hoff, 1221 Locust St, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for appellant.

John M. Morris III, Supreme Court Bldg, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper, III, J.



ORDER

Robert Reask appeals from his conviction of unlawful use of a weapon. Reask challenges the admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct, use of a photograph during closing argument that was not admitted into evidence at trial, and comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find no error.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Reask

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Reask

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. ROBERT REASK, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 3, 2000

Citations

28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)