From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reames

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2024
No. 2024-UP-209 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-209 Appellate Case 2021-000800

06-05-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Orlando Reames, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2024

Appeal From Sumter County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Kristi F. Curtis, Circuit Court Judge

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and TURNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Reames

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2024
No. 2024-UP-209 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Reames

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Orlando Reames, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 5, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-209 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2024)