From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rapp

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 31, 1973
281 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1973)

Opinion

No. 43606.

July 31, 1973.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Fredric J. Scott and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defenders, for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 274 So.2d 18, based upon conflict between that decision and Green v. State, 76 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1954). We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued.

The decisions are distinguishable in that the Green holding relied upon evidence tending to show that the defendant used assumed names intending that the signatures would be taken as the genuine signatures of other people. In the case sub judice, the District Court found that there was no evidence introduced by the State to show that respondent intended the signature of his assumed name to be taken as the genuine signature of another person. We have determined that the distinguishing evidentiary bases for these decisions dictate that this Court not entertain jurisdiction based upon conflict between them. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C.J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State v. Rapp

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 31, 1973
281 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Rapp

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. JOHN EDWARD RAPP, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 31, 1973

Citations

281 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1973)

Citing Cases

State v. Charles

The crime may exist even though the name is fictitious when it is shown that the fictitious name was used…

McClendon v. State

Unfortunately for the State, it had intended to prove some of the essential elements of the crime by…