In Randol v. Scott, 110 Cal. 590, a lease was made to two persons as lessees with covenant against assignment, including assignment by bankruptcy or operation of law.
Summary of this case from Miller v. FredekingNo. A130692.
August 27, 2008.
Cases affirmed without opinion.
In Randol v. Scott, 110 Cal. 590, a lease was made to two persons as lessees with covenant against assignment, including assignment by bankruptcy or operation of law.
Summary of this case from Miller v. FredekingIn Randol v. Scott, 110 Cal. 590, [42 P. 976], a covenant by "said lessees" not to permit an assignment of the lease to be made by bankruptcy or otherwise, without the written consent of the lessors, was held not to be violated by the filing of a petition in insolvency by one of the lessees and the resulting transfer of his interest in the leasehold to an assignee.
Summary of this case from Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.Full title:State v. Randol, Brandon Scott
Court:Oregon Court of Appeals
Date published: Aug 27, 2008
[7] It is settled in this state that a party benefited by a clause against assignment in a contract or lease…
Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.This view of the effect of the contract is supported by abundant authority both in this state and elsewhere.…