From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ralston

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1982
422 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

Nos. 81-259, 81-260.

December 8, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Lawrence L. Korda, J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Marc S. Nurik of Nurik, O'Donnell Lazarus, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Wood and Stroebel.


REVERSED. See State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981). We also reject the claim by appellees that Section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1979) violates their right to privacy embodied in Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution. Cf., State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d, at 519-520 (discussion of defendant's right not to be compelled to incriminate himself).

Accordingly, this cause is reversed with directions that the charges against appellees be reinstated.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Ralston

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1982
422 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Ralston

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM ROBERT RALSTON, APPELLEE. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 8, 1982

Citations

422 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)