From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Radick

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 5, 1926
249 P. 626 (Or. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs September 23, 1926

Reversed and remanded October 5, 1926

From Coos: JOHN C. KENDALL, Judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Peck Brand and Mr. J.F. Anderson.

For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. J.B. Bedingfield, District Attorney.


(No Syllabus.)


It has been stipulated that the decision of this court in the case of State v. Tony Milosevich shall be accepted as the decision in the above-entitled cause. Both cases were tried before the same court and jury and involve the same question on appeal.

In State v. Tony Milosevich, ante, p. 404 ( 249 P. 625), in an opinion this day rendered, the cause, on account of an erroneous instruction was reversed and remanded for a new trial. It follows that the same order will be entered herein.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McBRIDE, C.J., and BURNETT and COSHOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Radick

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 5, 1926
249 P. 626 (Or. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Radick

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. WILLIAM RADICK

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 5, 1926

Citations

249 P. 626 (Or. 1926)
249 P. 626

Citing Cases

Territory of Hawaii v. Ota

Requiring a defendant in a criminal case to prove his innocence by any degree of proof is contrary to the…