State v. Rachels

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 15, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-209831 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-209831 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-191

05-15-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.