From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Quehl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
540 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80012

03-06-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William Andrew QUEHL, Jr., Appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent. Samuel E. Buffaloe, for Appellant.


Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Samuel E. Buffaloe, for Appellant.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Quehl appeals his conviction following a jury trial for the class B felony of driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010, and sentence of eight years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress and admitting at trial evidence of his blood alcohol content because the State failed to show the existence of exigent circumstances to draw his blood without a warrant following his refusal. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Quehl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
540 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Quehl

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William Andrew QUEHL, Jr., Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

540 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)