From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Prisner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 27, 2000
20 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76517

Filed: June 27, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARION COUNTY, HON. ROBERT M. CLAYTON.

Amy Bartholow, Office of the Public Defender, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201-3722, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Krista D. Boston, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and James R. Dowd, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant, Daniel Prisner, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County following his conviction by a jury of an attempt to commit stealing in violation of Section 564.011 RSMo 1994. Prisner argues on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal and in imposing judgment and sentence for attempted stealing because the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Prisner took a substantial step toward appropriating property from the Tom Boland Ford car lot or that he had a purpose or intent to deprive anyone of property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25 (b).


Summaries of

State v. Prisner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 27, 2000
20 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Prisner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL PRISNER, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 27, 2000

Citations

20 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)