Opinion
20230107
09-28-2023
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Daniel Wayne Powell, Defendant and Appellant
Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Reid A. Brady, Judge.
Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
PER CURIAM.
[¶1] Daniel Wayne Powell appeals from an amended criminal judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty, reserving the right to appeal a district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Powell argues the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because the application for search warrant contained false or misleading information. He also argues the application lacked corroborating evidence of the confidential source, and lacked sufficient detail on the canine's alert. The district court found the application for search warrant did not contain statements that were knowingly or intentionally false or made with reckless disregard for the truth. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr