From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1939
2 S.E.2d 11 (N.C. 1939)

Opinion

(Filed 12 April, 1939.)

APPEAL by defendant from Armstrong, J., at October Term, 1938, of CABARRUS. No error.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Wettach for the State.

R. R. Hawfield for defendant.


The defendant was charged with possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. From judgment imposing sentence upon verdict of guilty, defendant appealed.


The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The only exception noted at the trial was to the ruling of the court in permitting a State's witness, a police officer, to say, in describing his visit to defendant's premises, where a quantity of whiskey was found, "We took a search warrant," without producing the warrant. There was no motion or request for the production of the warrant, and the objection seems to have been made after the evidence was in.

The exception is without merit.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1939
2 S.E.2d 11 (N.C. 1939)
Case details for

State v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LOGAN POWELL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1939

Citations

2 S.E.2d 11 (N.C. 1939)
2 S.E.2d 11