From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Poor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 23, 1912
125 P. 726 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 3637

Opinion Filed July 23, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Presenting Questions in Trial Court — Necessity for Motion for New Trial. The ruling on a demurrer to the evidence is a decision occurring on the trial; and, in order to enable the Supreme Court to review such ruling, it is necessary that a motion for a new trial be filed within the time prescribed by law.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge.

Proceedings by the State against D. W. Poor. From a judgment for defendant upon a demurrer to the evidence, the state brings error. Dismissed.

C. P. Holt, Co. Atty., for the State.

F. H. Riley, Geo. Jenkins, and William Beatty, for defendant in error.


This proceeding in error is brought to reverse a judgment rendered upon a demurrer to the evidence, and the errors complained of consist only of errors alleged to have occurred at the trial. Under this condition of the record, nothing is presented to this court by the petition in error that can be considered; and upon the authority of James v. Jackson et al., 30 Okla. 190, 120 P. 288, Stump v. Porter et al., 31 Okla. 157, 120 P. 639, and State of Oklahoma v. Adams, 31 Okla. 775, 123 P. 1127, the cause must be dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Poor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 23, 1912
125 P. 726 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

State v. Poor

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. POOR

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 23, 1912

Citations

125 P. 726 (Okla. 1912)
125 P. 726

Citing Cases

Shives v. Frohberg

Opinion Filed November 4, 1913.APPEAL AND ERROR — Motion for New Trial — Necessity. Syllabus same as State v.…

State v. Adams

The case-made filed herein fails to show that any motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, under the…