From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pittsley

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 16, 2009
215 P.3d 875 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 0602255CR, A137178.

Submitted June 23, 2008.

Affirmed July 15, 2009. petition for review denied September 16, 2009.

Appeal from the Klamath County Circuit Court, Richard B. Rambo, Judge.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Appellate Division, and Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Gary Bruce Pittsley filed the supplemental brief pro se.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Sercombe, Judge, and Carson, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was convicted of burglary and other offenses. On the burglary conviction, the trial court imposed the maximum sentence allowed under grid block 7-A of the sentencing guidelines. On appeal, defendant contends that he instead should have been sentenced under grid block 7-B, which has a shorter maximum allowable sentence, because the state failed to prove that a prior out-of-state conviction constituted a "person" felony for purposes of the guidelines. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state's concession.

Defendant also raises a number of other challenges to his convictions and sentences, each of which is unpreserved and/or lacks merit. We reject those challenges without discussion.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Pittsley

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 16, 2009
215 P.3d 875 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

State v. Pittsley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GARY BRUCE PITTSLEY…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 16, 2009

Citations

215 P.3d 875 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
215 P.3d 875

Citing Cases

State v. Pittsley

September 17, 2009. Appeal from the ( 229 Or App 706). Petitions for Review…