From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pierson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb 7, 2013
391 S.W.3d 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 98022.

2013-02-7

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher T. PIERSON, Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, John Berkemeyer, Judge. Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Jennifer A. Rodewald, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, John Berkemeyer, Judge.
Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Jennifer A. Rodewald, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER



Christopher Pierson (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of receiving stolen property and tampering with computer data. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion for acquittal and entering judgment because the evidence was insufficient to prove either count.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Pierson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb 7, 2013
391 S.W.3d 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher T. PIERSON, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

391 S.W.3d 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)