From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Phillips

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2010
236 Or. App. 461 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 93C21516; A137773.

Filed April 19, 2010.

December 9, 2010.

Marion County Circuit Court, Terry Ann Leggert, Judge.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Zachary Lovett Mazer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.

Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


In State v. Phillips, 234 Or App 676, 229 P3d 631 (2010), defendant appealed from a judgment of contempt, raising four assignments of error. He subsequently filed a pro se supplemental brief raising two additional assignments of error. We rejected his first assignment of error on the ground that it was not preserved, and, in a footnote, we expressly rejected the remaining three assignments of error in his opening brief. In a petition for reconsideration, defendant points out that we did not expressly dispose of the assignments of error in his pro se supplemental brief. Defendant is correct. We therefore grant his petition for reconsideration in order to state that, in addition to the other assignments of error that we rejected, we also reject the assignments of error in his pro se supplemental brief without discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Phillips

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2010
236 Or. App. 461 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS, JR.…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

236 Or. App. 461 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
240 P.3d 1099
246 P.3d 482

Citing Cases

State v. Phillips

December 9, 2010. On review from the ( 236 Or. App. 461) (petition and supplemental petition) Petitions for…

State v. Fitzgerald

More importantly, even if defendant could not be expected to raise an objection, defense counsel could have…