From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1942
23 S.E.2d 342 (N.C. 1942)

Opinion

(Filed 16 December, 1942.)

Criminal Law § 80 —

The defendants having failed to prosecute their appeals, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss is allowed. However, pursuant to custom in capital cases, the Supreme Court has examined the record for errors upon its face, and finds none.

MOTION by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Patton for the State.


At the October Term, 1942, Durham Superior Court, the defendants herein, Daniel Phillips and Rosana Lightner Phillips, were tried upon indictment charging them with the murder of Harry F. Watkins, which resulted in convictions of murder in the first degree and sentences of death as the law commands. From the judgments thus entered, the defendants gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. No bonds were required, as the defendants were granted the privilege of appealing in forma pauperis. S. v. Stafford, 203 N.C. 601, 166 S.E. 734.

The Clerk certifies that no case on appeal has been filed in his office; that the time for filing same has expired, and that he is advised by counsel "no appeal has been perfected." Hence, as the defendants have failed to prosecute their appeals, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed. S. v. Watson, 208 N.C. 70, 179 S.E. 455. However, pursuant to custom in capital cases, we have examined the record proper to see that no error appears upon its face. None has been found on the present record. S. v. Morrow, 220 N.C. 441, 17 S.E.2d 507.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1942
23 S.E.2d 342 (N.C. 1942)
Case details for

State v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. DANIEL PHILLIPS AND ROSANA LIGHTNER PHILLIPS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1942

Citations

23 S.E.2d 342 (N.C. 1942)
23 S.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

State v. Bryant

From the judgment thus rendered, defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. Defendant was given…