From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Peek

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 18, 2000
18 S.W.3d 116 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76229.

April 18, 2000.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, HONORABLE KEITH M. SUNDERLAND, JUDGE.

Roger Allen Peek, Pro Se, 160 Janet Drive, Moscow Mills, MO 63362 for appellant.

Mark D. Bradley, 104 W. Main Street, Suite E, Warrenton, MO 63383, for respondent.

Before: Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Roger A. Peek (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction in a court-tried case for the offense of trespass in the second degree, in violation of § 569.150 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00 and was further required to pay court costs of $69.50. On appeal, Defendant raises the following claims of error: (1) he was charged pursuant to an unlawful procedure; (2) trespass in the second degree is not a prosecutable offense, in that it is statutorily classified as an infraction rather than a felony or misdemeanor; and (3) insufficiency of evidence. We have reviewed Defendant's brief, the legal file and transcript. The claims of error are without merit, and a written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

The State has not filed a brief in this matter.


Summaries of

State v. Peek

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 18, 2000
18 S.W.3d 116 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Peek

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. ROGER A. PEEK, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 18, 2000

Citations

18 S.W.3d 116 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)