From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Parsons

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Oct 25, 2017
288 Or. App. 449 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

A159849

10-25-2017

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cory Adam PARSONS, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.


Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

PER CURIAMDefendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Parsons , 287 Or.App. 351, 403 P.3d 497, 2017 WL 3611574 (2017), in which we vacated the supplemental judgment and remanded for the trial court to determine in the first instance whether damage to the city's police car was a "reasonably foreseeable" result of defendant's criminal activities, in light of State v. Ramos , 358 Or. 581, 368 P.3d 446 (2016). Among other things, the trial court had ordered defendant to pay $500 in restitution to the city and $2,546.89 in restitution to the insurance company, for costs incurred to repair the vehicle.

As presented to us on appeal, defendant separately assigned error to the $500 due to the city and the $2,546.89 due to the insurance company. In a combined argument, defendant argued that the court erred in imposing restitution for damage to the police car because the damage was not "reasonably foreseeable." However, our opinion at one point described defendant's argument as pertaining to the $500 in restitution to the city, without mentioning the amount payable to the insurance company. To avoid confusion as to the scope of our holding, defendant asks us to modify our opinion to clarify that the supplemental judgment is vacated and remanded as to both the $500 and $2,546.89 restitution awards. The state has not opposed the petition. We allow reconsideration and modify our opinion to clarify that defendant's arguments and our analysis concerned the entire $3,046.89 restitution amount imposed for the damage to the police car.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Parsons

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Oct 25, 2017
288 Or. App. 449 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Parsons

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cory Adam PARSONS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Oct 25, 2017

Citations

288 Or. App. 449 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
403 P.3d 834

Citing Cases

State v. Parsons

The relevant facts, which are undisputed, are set forth in our first opinion, State v. Parsons , 287 Or. App.…

State v. Lobue

State v. Parsons , 287 Or. App. 351, 356, 403 P.3d 497, adh'd to as modified on recons. , 288 Or. App. 449,…