Opinion
Nos. 20170180 20170181
12-07-2017
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Juan Manuel PALACIO, III, Defendant and Appellant
James A. Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Samuel A. Gereszek, East Grand Forks, MN, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
James A. Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Samuel A. Gereszek, East Grand Forks, MN, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Juan Manuel Palacio III appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Palacio argues the state presented insufficient evidence to uphold the jury's verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Gray, 2017 ND 108, ¶¶ 15–16, 893 N.W.2d 484 (affirming judgment where appellant failed to provide a trial transcript on appeal, making it "impossible for this Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review" whether the defendant preserved for appeal the issue of insufficiency of the evidence or whether sufficient evidence supported the verdict).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers