From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Orr

Supreme Court of Montana
May 10, 2022
DA 20-0578 (Mont. May. 10, 2022)

Opinion

DA 20-0578

05-10-2022

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID LLOYD ORR, Defendant and Appellant.


ORDER

Appellant David Lloyd Orr appeals from the Judgment of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County. Orr argues the District Court erred by illegally suspending his sentence for one year and by ordering him to pay $2, 124.46 in financial obligations in its written judgment that were not orally pronounced at sentencing.

The State has filed a Notice of Concession that this matter should be remanded to the District Court for the purpose of entering an amended sentence and judgment. Without agreeing to all of the arguments Orr has raised, the State agrees that in this case the District Court erred in imposing a suspension period of longer than six months and in imposing financial obligations totaling $2, 124.46 in the written judgment that were not part of the court's oral pronouncement.

Based on Orr's opening brief and the State's concession, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, with instructions for the District Court to vacate the one-year suspension period and impose a suspension period of no greater than six month and to strike the financial obligations totaling $2, 124.46 that were not orally pronounced at sentencing.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to presiding judge Honorable Howard F. Recht.


Summaries of

State v. Orr

Supreme Court of Montana
May 10, 2022
DA 20-0578 (Mont. May. 10, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Orr

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID LLOYD ORR, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

DA 20-0578 (Mont. May. 10, 2022)