From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. O'Quist

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1978
579 P.2d 871 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

DA 127729, CA 10139

Argued May 17, affirmed May 30, reconsideration denied June 28, petition for review denied July 25, 1978

Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Thomas L. Moultrie, Judge.

Phillip M. Margolin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jan P. Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee, Richardson and Joseph, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Defendant, upon trial by jury, was convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.415. His principal assignment of error is that the court erred in permitting two witnesses to relate out-of-court statements of the complaining witness. The error, if any, was harmless because defendant's version of the facts as voluntarily stated to a police officer and another witness was substantially the same as the out-of-court statements of the complaining witness.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. O'Quist

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1978
579 P.2d 871 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

State v. O'Quist

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THEODORE C. O'QUIST, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 25, 1978

Citations

579 P.2d 871 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)
579 P.2d 871

Citing Cases

State v. Mitchell

Since at trial Officer Smith repeated, without objection, the statements made to him directly, no prejudice…