From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Odermann

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 15, 2016
876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)

Opinion

No. 20150216.

03-15-2016

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Michael Kendrick ODERMANN, Defendant and Appellant.

Frederick R. Fremgen (on brief), State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Mark T. Blumer (on brief), Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Frederick R. Fremgen (on brief), State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Mark T. Blumer (on brief), Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Michael Odermann appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary and two counts of theft of property. He argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the verdicts and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Odermann

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 15, 2016
876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Odermann

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Michael Kendrick…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Mar 15, 2016

Citations

876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)
2016 N.D. 51