From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Norman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 5, 2018
2018-UP-444 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-444

12-05-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Deshon Jermaine Norman, Appellant. Appellate No. 2017-001239

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak and Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2018

Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak and Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C. J, and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Norman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 5, 2018
2018-UP-444 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Deshon Jermaine Norman, Appellant. Appellate No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 5, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-444 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2018)