From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nguyen

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 4, 2018
821 S.E.2d 665 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

noting that the State moved to strike the defendant's reply as improper, though dismissing the motion as moot

Summary of this case from Burr v. Jackson
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. COA17-1163

12-04-2018

STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony VINH NGUYEN

Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Amy Kunstling Irene, for the State. Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding, by Assistant Appellate Defender Michele A. Goldman, for defendant.

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.

Summaries of

State v. Nguyen

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 4, 2018
821 S.E.2d 665 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

noting that the State moved to strike the defendant's reply as improper, though dismissing the motion as moot

Summary of this case from Burr v. Jackson
Case details for

State v. Nguyen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTHONY VINH NGUYEN

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Dec 4, 2018

Citations

821 S.E.2d 665 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Burr v. Jackson

State law may have required Burr to seek permission from the court to file a reply. See State v. Riley , 137…

1 Citing Cases