From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Neves

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 15, 1967
423 P.2d 773 (Or. 1967)

Opinion

Argued February 7, 1967

Affirmed February 15, 1967

Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County.

DON H. SANDERS, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Verden L. Hockett, Jr., Roseburg, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

William G. Carter, Roseburg, Deputy District Attorney, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Avery W. Thompson, District Attorney, Roseburg.

Before WILLIAM C. PERRY, Chief Justice, and SLOAN and GOODWIN, Justices.


The defendant Kenneth Elman Neves was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and appeals.

Defendant assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury in accordance with two of his requested instructions.

An examination of the record discloses that the requested instructions were improper statements of the law as they related to the facts in controversy.

Defendant also apparently complains of an instruction given by the trial court. Defendant did not except to the instruction as given. However, we have examined the instruction and find it a correct statement of the law.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Neves

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 15, 1967
423 P.2d 773 (Or. 1967)
Case details for

State v. Neves

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KENNETH ELMAN NEVES, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 15, 1967

Citations

423 P.2d 773 (Or. 1967)
423 P.2d 773

Citing Cases

State v. Wright

ORS 161.209. The trial court, therefore, did not err in refusing to give the requested instruction.State v.…

State v. Stoneberg

* * *' "See also: State v. Neves, 246 Or. 55, 423 P.2d 773 (1967). The court correctly refused to give the…