Opinion
No. S-94-794.
Filed November 17, 1995.
Drunk Driving: Prior Convictions. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993) is a mere affirmance and continuation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07, and convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used to enhance the penalty for driving while under the influence of alcohol under § 60-6,196.
Petition for further review from the Nebraska Court of Appeals, Sievers, Chief Judge, and Irwin and Miller-Lerman, Judges, on appeal thereto from the District Court for Lancaster County, Earl J. Witthoff, Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for Lancaster County, Gale Pokorny, Judge. Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed.
Dennis R. Keefe, Lancaster County Public Defender, and Susan R. Tast for appellant.
Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and Delores Coe-Barbee for appellee.
White, C.J., Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Wright, Connolly, and Gerrard, JJ.
This case involves an appeal from a conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI), third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993). The defendant, Douglas F. Nelson, contends that his two prior convictions, imposed under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1986 Supp. 1987), cannot be used to enhance his DWI sentence under § 60-6,196. On appeal to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, the court held that § 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance of § 39-669.07 and that the prior convictions can be used for enhancement purposes under § 60-6,196. State v. Nelson, 95 NCA No. 17, case No. A-94-794 (not designated for permanent publication). Nelson successfully petitioned this court for further review.
Our recent decision in State v. Sundling, ante p. 732, 538 N.W.2d 749 (1995), is controlling. Sundling held that § 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance and continuation of § 39-669.07 and that convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used to enhance the penalty for a DWI conviction under § 60-6,196. Therefore, we affirm.
Affirmed.