State v. Nash

Full title: STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee v. BOBBY KENNETH NASH, JR., Appellant

Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville

Date published: Apr 24, 1997

No. 01C01-9409-CR-00330 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 24, 1997)

Opinion

No. 01C01-9409-CR-00330.

April 24, 1997.

Davidson County, Hon. Seth Norman, Judge, (First Degree Murder).

For the Appellant: Sam E. Wallace, Jr.

For the Appellee: John Knox Walkup, Attorney General of Tennessee and Darian B. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee, Victor S. Johnson, III, District Attorney General and Kimberly Hattaway.

TIPTON, Judge

OPINION

The defendant, Bobby Kenneth Nash, Jr., appeals from his jury conviction in the Davidson County Criminal Court for first degree murder. He received a sentence of life in prison. In this appeal as of right, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his first degree murder conviction.

In the light most favorable to the state, see State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832 (Tenn. 1978), the proof established that the defendant shot his aunt six times while she was stopped at a red light. The gun was within twelve inches of her head when he fired four of the shots into her face. During the six months preceding the shooting, the defendant and the victim were involved in a dispute over the defendant's father's estate. The defendant remarked that he wanted to get back at the victim and described how it would be possible for him to go to the top of a school building and shoot the victim as she left the house where she was living. On another occasion during the months preceding the shooting, he stated that the best way to remedy serious problems that you have with a person is to kill the person. Two weeks before the shooting the defendant refused to promise that he would not kill the victim.

After full consideration of the record, the briefs, and the law governing the issue presented, we are of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for first degree murder and that no precedential value would be derived from the rendering of a full opinion. Therefore we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tenn Ct. Crim. App. R.

________________________ Joseph M. Tipton, Judge

CONCUR:

________________________ Gary R. Wade, Judge

________________________ Paul G. Summers, Judge