From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Murto

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 4, 1982
322 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-637.

August 4, 1982.

Appeal from the District Court, Ramsey County, Hyam Segell, J.

William Falvey, Ramsey County Public Defender, Michael Cromett, Asst. Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Thomas W. Foley, County Atty., Steven DeCoster, Asst. County Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


In State v. Murto, 316 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1982), we ruled that the district court erred in refusing to order execution of sentence after defendant rejected the district court's stay of execution of sentence and the imposition of a year of probationary jail time. On remand, the district court executed sentence, as requested, but refused to grant defendant credit against his prison term for time spent in jail while the case was on appeal. Holding that it would be "fundamentally unfair" to deny defendant this credit, see State v. Jonason, 292 N.W.2d 730, 735 (Minn. 1980), we reverse the district court's order and grant defendant credit for time spent in jail between December 16, 1981, and the day sentence was executed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Murto

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 4, 1982
322 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Murto

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mark Paul MURTO, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 4, 1982

Citations

322 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1982)