From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Moyer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 1992
840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

90040607, 90040608; CA A68412 (Control), A68413, Cases Consolidated

Argued and submitted July 31, 1992

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing November 4, 1992

Appeal from Circuit Court, Linn County.

James C. Goode, Judge.

Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant appeals convictions on eight counts of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. For each count, the indictment alleged that the crime occurred as part of a drug delivery scheme or network. Defendant was found guilty of the charges, and the jury returned a special verdict that each offense was committed as part of a scheme or network. Defendant did not demur, but raised an issue that challenged the sentences on the basis of the "scheme or network" findings.

The state concedes that the court erred in sentencing. State v. Moeller, 105 Or. App. 434, 806 P.2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or. 76, 815 P.2d 701 (1991). We accept the state's concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Moyer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 1992
840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Moyer

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICKEL LARRY MOYER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 4, 1992

Citations

840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
840 P.2d 112