From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Morrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2010
364 N.C. 424 (N.C. 2010)

Opinion

No. 461A09.

Filed 8 October 2010.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 200 N.C. App. ___, 683 S.E.2d 754 (2009), finding defendant's constitutional challenge to an order entered on 19 February 2008 by Judge Henry E. Frye, Jr. in Superior Court, Wilkes County, without merit but remanding for additional findings of fact and a determination of the duration of defendant's enrollment in satellite-based monitoring. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 February 2010.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Mark Montgomery for defendant-appellant.


For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C.___, ___ S.E.2d ___, slip op. (Oct. 8, 2010) (No. 448PA09), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C.___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Oct. 8, 2010) (No. 448PA09).


Summaries of

State v. Morrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2010
364 N.C. 424 (N.C. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Morrow

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH DWAYNE MORROW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 2010

Citations

364 N.C. 424 (N.C. 2010)

Citing Cases

State v. Gross

We [then] review the trial court's order to ensure that the determination that defendant requires the highest…

State v. Wilder

Id. The STATIC–99 factors include: (1) the age of the offender, (2) whether the offender has “ever lived with…