From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 27, 2024
No. 2024-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-098 Appellate Case 2021-001300

03-27-2024

The State, Respondent, v. James Rickey Morris, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2024.

Appeal From Pickens County G. D. Morgan, Jr., Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 27, 2024
No. 2024-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. James Rickey Morris, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)