From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2017
324 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

01-25-2017

STATE of Connecticut v. Darnell MOORE

Allison M. Near, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.


Allison M. Near, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 169 Conn.App. 470, 151 A.3d 412 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"In concluding that the defendant could not prevail on his motion to strike the voir dire panel on the ground that it failed to constitute a fair cross-section of the community:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that census data pertaining to the entire African–American population in Connecticut and New London county was not probative evidence with respect to the claimed underrepresentation of African–American males in the jury pool?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly decline, in light of the provisions of General Statutes § 51–232 (c), to exercise its supervisory authority over the administration of justice to enforce the collection of demographic data to permit analysis of the diversity of jury panels in Connecticut?"


Summaries of

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2017
324 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Darnell MOORE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 25, 2017

Citations

324 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2017)
324 Conn. 915

Citing Cases

State v. Moore

Did the Appellate Court properly decline, in light of the provisions of General Statutes § 51-232 (c), to…

State v. Chester J.

" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Moore , 324 Conn. 915, 915–16, 153 A.3d 1289 (2017).…