From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. MOOR

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
May 10, 2010
123 Haw. 133 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

In Moore, the defendant contended the prosecutor's statement that two witnesses "told the truth, the honest truth," made during the rebuttal argument, was improper and constituted prosecutorial misconduct.

Summary of this case from State v. Krueger

Opinion

No. 30001.

May 10, 2010.


Summary dispositional orders Affirmed.


Summaries of

STATE v. MOOR

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
May 10, 2010
123 Haw. 133 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

In Moore, the defendant contended the prosecutor's statement that two witnesses "told the truth, the honest truth," made during the rebuttal argument, was improper and constituted prosecutorial misconduct.

Summary of this case from State v. Krueger
Case details for

STATE v. MOOR

Case Details

Full title:State v. Moore

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: May 10, 2010

Citations

123 Haw. 133 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

State v. Krueger

We review the Prosecutor's remarks in context. See State v. Moore, No. 30001, (App. May 10, 2010) (SDO). In…