From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Miner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Three
Oct 1, 1980
606 S.W.2d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

finding that a handwritten notation of the “judgment and sentence” in a docket entry was insufficient to meet the requirement of Rule 30.04 that a copy of the judgment be included in the record on appeal

Summary of this case from State v. Paul

Opinion

No. 11748.

October 1, 1980.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CRAWFORD COUNTY, WILLIAM E. SEAY, J.

John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Paul Robert Otto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Lawrence N. Koeln, Centerville, for appellant.


Defendant Ricky Lynn Miner was charged by felony information with first degree burglary. A jury convicted him of the lesser included offense of second degree burglary, and recommended 2 1/2 years imprisonment as punishment. The trial court granted a new trial because of instructional error. Defendant was then retried under the first degree burglary information. The jury again returned a verdict of guilty of second degree burglary, and recommended as punishment confinement in the county jail for one year. This appeal followed.

The record on appeal in this case is fatally deficient, as it does not contain a judgment. A copy of the judgment must be included in the record on appeal, as the entry of judgment triggers the appellate process. State v. Hagar, 561 S.W.2d 444-445 (Mo.App. 1978); State v. Wilke, 560 S.W.2d 601, 602 (Mo.App. 1978). In the record, appellant has designated as a judgment a handwritten entry in the trial court's minutes dated 3/21/80, which merely recites that the defendant was granted allocution, and that it was the judgment and sentence of the court that defendant be confined in the Crawford County jail for a period of one year in accordance with the verdict of the jury finding defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. Such a docket entry cannot be transmogrified into a judgment merely because the defendant calls it one. State v. Pogue, 552 S.W.2d 75, 76 (Mo.App. 1977). The docket entry fails to constitute rendition of a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.

The appeal is dismissed as premature, and the cause remanded to the trial court for rendition and entry of a final judgment, State v. Preston, 563 S.W.2d 98, 99 (Mo.App. 1978), after which defendant may, if he chooses, file a new notice of appeal. State v. Myers, 467 S.W.2d 577 (Mo.App. 1971).

All concur.


Summaries of

State v. Miner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Three
Oct 1, 1980
606 S.W.2d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)

finding that a handwritten notation of the “judgment and sentence” in a docket entry was insufficient to meet the requirement of Rule 30.04 that a copy of the judgment be included in the record on appeal

Summary of this case from State v. Paul
Case details for

State v. Miner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. RICKY LYNN MINER, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 1, 1980

Citations

606 S.W.2d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

State v. Paul

The October 10, 2012 docket entry is also not a final judgment because its “recitation[ ] do[es] not comply…

State v. Nenninger

The docket entry recitations do not comply with requirements for a judgment imposed by Rule 29.07(c). The…