From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Michaud

Superior Court of Maine
Nov 13, 2017
17-055 (Me. Super. Nov. 13, 2017)

Opinion

17-055

11-13-2017

STATE OF MAINE v. ARTHUR MICHAUD


ORDER

WILLIAM ANDERSON JUSTICE.

After trial, the Court took this case under advisement to conduct research on the issue of whether being an on-duty operator in possession of marijuana, alone, is sufficient proof of this violation or whether the State must prove that the defendant's use of the drug rendered him incapable of safely operating the vehicle he was driving. The relevant regulation, 49 CFR 392, 4, prohibits the possession by such a person of any 21 CFR 1308.11 substance, which includes marijuana according to subsection 1 of that regulation, and any other substance, to a degree which renders the driver incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle, in subsection 4. According to 21 CFR 1308.11, marijuana is a Schedule 1 substance, so it is not necessary for the State to prove use to a "degree which renders the driver incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle, " which was not proved in this case.

Based on this analysis, the Court finds the defendant guilty of this offense and a sentence will be imposed at a later hearing.


Summaries of

State v. Michaud

Superior Court of Maine
Nov 13, 2017
17-055 (Me. Super. Nov. 13, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Michaud

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MAINE v. ARTHUR MICHAUD

Court:Superior Court of Maine

Date published: Nov 13, 2017

Citations

17-055 (Me. Super. Nov. 13, 2017)