From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Michael D Lansky LLC

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 8, 2023
No. CV-23-00233-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 8, 2023)

Opinion

CV-23-00233-TUC-CKJ

12-08-2023

State of Arizona, et al., Plaintiff, v. Michael D Lansky LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE CINDY K. JORGENSON JUDGE

On December 5, 2023, counsel of record for the State of Vermont, Mr. Edwin L. “Ted” Hobson, sent a notice to withdraw as counsel. He did not caption the document or file it electronically. At docketing, it was treated as a motion. On December 6, 2023, counsel of record for the State of Nebraska, Michaela J. Hohwieler, filed a Motion to Withdraw. Both attorneys failed to comply with the United States District Court Rules for the District of Arizona, Rule 83.3(b), as follows:

(4) Where there has been a change of counsel in the same law firm or governmental law office, an order of substitution or association is not required; the new attorney must file a notice of substitution or association. The notice shall state the names of the attorneys who are the subjects of the substitution or association and the current address and e-mail address of the attorney substituting or associating.
Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the two motions to withdraw as counsel (Docs. 52 and 53) are DENIED.


Summaries of

State v. Michael D Lansky LLC

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 8, 2023
No. CV-23-00233-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 8, 2023)
Case details for

State v. Michael D Lansky LLC

Case Details

Full title:State of Arizona, et al., Plaintiff, v. Michael D Lansky LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Dec 8, 2023

Citations

No. CV-23-00233-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 8, 2023)