From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mejean

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-001282 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2015-001282 Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-259

06-28-2017

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Eric Mejean, Appellant.

Appellate Defender John Harrison Strom, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Greenville County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender John Harrison Strom, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Harry, 321 S.C. 273, 277, 468 S.E.2d 76, 79 (Ct. App. 1996) ("A motion for a directed verdict made at the close of the [State's] case is not sufficient to preserve error unless renewed at the close of all the evidence, because once the defense has come forward with its proof, the propriety of a directed verdict can only be tested in terms of all the evidence." (quoting Kimbrough v. Commonwealth, 550 S.W.2d 525, 529 (Ky. 1977))); State v. Bailey, 368 S.C. 39, 43 n.4, 626 S.E.2d 898, 900 n.4 (Ct. App. 2006) ("If a defendant presents evidence after the denial of his directed verdict motion at the close of the State's case, he must make another directed verdict motion at the close of all evidence in order to appeal the sufficiency of the evidence."). AFFIRMED. WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and LEE, A.J., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

State v. Mejean

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-001282 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Mejean

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Eric Mejean, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2015-001282 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2017)