Opinion
Argued May 16, 1928 —
Decided June 22, 1928.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 217.
For the plaintiff in error, King Vogt.
For the defendant in error, Arthur H. Holland.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.