From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McDougald

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 7, 2008
362 N.C. 224 (N.C. 2008)

Opinion


657 S.E.2d 351 (N.C. 2008) 362 N.C. 224 STATE of North Carolina v. Dwight McDOUGALD. No. 64A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 7, 2008

          Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C.App. 41, 638 S.E.2d 546 (2007) , finding no error in judgments entered 12 April 2005 by Judge Jerry Cash Martin in Superior Court, Guilford County. On 11 October 2007, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2008.

          Roy Cooper , Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II , Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

          Irving Joyner, Cary, for defendant-appellant.

          PER CURIAM.

          Defendant appeals to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. In light of the State's concession of error, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right i.e. whether it was appropriate to dismiss defendant's appeal on procedural grounds. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to determine if any error under Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006) was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed.

          REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. McDougald

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 7, 2008
362 N.C. 224 (N.C. 2008)
Case details for

State v. McDougald

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DWIGHT McDOUGALD

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 7, 2008

Citations

362 N.C. 224 (N.C. 2008)
362 N.C. 224

Citing Cases

State v. McDougald

We are to determine if any error pursuant to Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d…

State v. Brunson

If an issue is not preserved by timely objection or by rule or law, it may be reviewed as plain error when it…