From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCrea

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 21, 1985
696 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

82-0351; CA A31273

Argued and submitted October 29, 1984

Affirmed as modified March 6, 1985 Reconsideration denied April 12, 1985 Petition for review denied May 21, 1985 ( 299 Or. 203)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County.

Jon B. Lund, Judge.

Helen I. Bloch, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Robert E. Barton, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Five-year minimum sentence on conviction for attempted murder deleted; affirmed as modified.


Defendant appeals her convictions in a single trial of attempted murder of one victim and manslaughter in the first degree of a second victim. The convictions arose out of a "single criminal episode." See ORS 131.505(4). The court sentenced defendant to a 20-year term for manslaughter, with a five-year minimum, ORS 161.610, because she used a firearm during commission of the crime. The court also sentenced defendant to a 20-year term for attempted murder, with a five-year minimum, also pursuant to ORS 161.610. The sentences, including the five-year firearm minimum sentences, were to run concurrently. Defendant asserts that she cannot be sentenced to two concurrent five-year firearm minimums, citing State v. Hardesty, 68 Or. App. 591, 682 P.2d 824 (1984). Hardesty dealt with imposition of consecutive five-year firearm minimum terms. The Supreme Court has now affirmed our decision. State v. Hardesty, 298 Or. 616, 695 P.2d 569 (1985). We now hold that Hardesty applies to concurrent as well as consecutive minimum firearm sentences imposed on a defendant who is convicted in a single trial of several felonies committed when using a firearm. ORS 161.610 does not authorize imposition of multiple minimum concurrent sentences. Defendant's other assignments of error lack merit.

Five-year minimum sentence on conviction for attempted murder deleted; affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

State v. McCrea

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 21, 1985
696 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

State v. McCrea

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DEBORAH MYRTLE McCREA, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 21, 1985

Citations

696 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
696 P.2d 1129

Citing Cases

State v. Pakulak

This court has concluded, pursuant to ORS 161.610, that the Hardesty rule applies to concurrent as well as…