From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCloud

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 30, 2002
56 P.3d 962 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

holding that Barnum requires that two nonconsensual sexual touchings of the victim during the same criminal episode must result in separate convictions, but the merger of sentences.

Summary of this case from State v. Lucio-Camargo

Opinion

000849967; A112227

Submitted on remand September 17, 2002.

Filed: October 30, 2002

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. McCloud, 334 Or. 491, 52 P.3d 1056 (2002).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Michael H. Marcus, Judge.

Garrett A. Richardson for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


This case is before us on remand after the Supreme Court vacated our previous opinion in light of State v. Barnum , 333 Or. 297, 39 P.3d 178 (2002). State v. McCloud , 177 Or. App. 511, 34 P.3d 699 (2001), vacated, 334 Or. 491, 52 P.3d 1056 (2002). In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Barnum, we now affirm the trial court's decision.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. McCloud

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 30, 2002
56 P.3d 962 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

holding that Barnum requires that two nonconsensual sexual touchings of the victim during the same criminal episode must result in separate convictions, but the merger of sentences.

Summary of this case from State v. Lucio-Camargo
Case details for

State v. McCloud

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. PATRICK K. McCLOUD, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 30, 2002

Citations

56 P.3d 962 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
56 P.3d 962

Citing Cases

State v. Sanders

As noted, the state argues that we erred in instructing the trial court to merge the relevant two…

State v. Lucio-Camargo

Having determined that there is only one separately punishable offense, we do not reach the question of…