From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McBride

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 8, 2002
807 So. 2d 836 (La. 2002)

Opinion

No. 2001-K-0588

February 8, 2002

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 98-171; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-KA-2904.

On Writ of Certiorari to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal.


Writ granted. See Per Curiam.

JPV

PFC

CDK

BJJ

CDT

JTK

JLW


Writ Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal, substituting a parole-ineligible 15-year term for the defendant's original sentence, is vacated and the sentence imposed by the district court is reinstated. On sentence review the only pertinent query is "whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate." State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 4 (La. 5/31/96), 674 So.2d 957, 959 (quoting State v. Humphrey, 445 So.2d 1155, 1165 (La. 1984)), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1043, 117 S.Ct. 615 (1996). See State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La. 10/13/97), 703 So.2d 698. After an extensive sentencing hearing, the trial court carefully weighed both aggravating and mitigating factors, articulated reasons for choice of punishment and imposed a sentence within statutory range. The record adequately supports the sentencing choice, and punishment is neither disproportionate to the offense nor the infliction of needless pain and suffering. State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762, 767 (La. 1979); State v. Bonanno, 384 So.2d 355 (La. 1980).


Summaries of

State v. McBride

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 8, 2002
807 So. 2d 836 (La. 2002)
Case details for

State v. McBride

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ROBERT B. MCBRIDE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 8, 2002

Citations

807 So. 2d 836 (La. 2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Sims

Even though we find nothing in this record to suggest that the sentencing judge failed to consider mitigating…

State v. Woodward

On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is whether the trial court abused its broad…